tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2686354713190138224.post1143507845308129593..comments2023-10-12T00:07:25.722+13:00Comments on roarprawn: Is Dis BeliefUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2686354713190138224.post-62519020571750885002010-05-26T19:59:22.704+12:002010-05-26T19:59:22.704+12:00I agree with Wise Up 100%.
Just when I was thinki...I agree with Wise Up 100%.<br /><br />Just when I was thinking that I was reading a post that any person with a normal level of compassion could emphasise with, the inclusion of Al Gore's Weather drivel had to cancel the whole post.<br /><br />What the heck has AGW got to do with your illness?<br /><br />You're making me crook now.FijiDavenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2686354713190138224.post-7332964658860051852010-05-26T19:42:15.136+12:002010-05-26T19:42:15.136+12:00An 'illness of the brain chemistry??'An 'illness of the brain chemistry??'mojohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18400094599778512902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2686354713190138224.post-5628242786885102102010-05-26T13:47:08.643+12:002010-05-26T13:47:08.643+12:00You have my best wishes regarding your illness. Th...You have my best wishes regarding your illness. The fact that our views on AGW differ doesn't mean that I wish you ill will.<br />Let's assume for the sake of it that humans are causing temperature rises from our CO2 emissions. Do you think the schemes of governments around the world are going to make any difference?<br />The world emits about 35 billion tonnes CO2 per year. Carbon trading currently prices it at $US20 per tonne, so $US700 billion worth of carbon will be traded per year. <br />As with any commodity trading a lot of people get rich for zero actual production. The thing with this is that the money these people gain is coming from you and me. Additionally the manufacturing base simply shifts to China, who see this as an opportunity for economic growth, so there is no overall reduction in emissions.<br /><br />The question of whether CAGW is proven or real or whatever is kind of moot. It is noise. The actions taken in the name of AGW do nothing but enrich a few from the pockets of the rest, with no real positive outcomes for the environment AT ALL.<br /><br />The environment would have been far far better off without the Copenhagen conference with everyone flying in and renting limos. Is Al Gore really worried about AGW? He still has his private jet and has recently bought coastal property, so I don't think he is.<br /><br />Who's the denier, really?Wise Upnoreply@blogger.com