Tuesday, 24 March 2009
BIG DAY FOR FONTERRA
We think whatever they have to say it will be dressed up to look like a Sunday lamb roast when in reality it will be smelly old tough hunk of mutton.
NBR has been keeping a very close eye on what big issues are for Fonterra
It makes for very interesting reading.
We will keep you posted
Monday, 9 March 2009
FONTERRA FACING EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING
The story in the Farmers Weekly last week has struck a chord and the Marshes who started the ball rolling are seeking advice on the process to call the Extraordinary General Meeting after getting a very big response.
We will watch developments with interest.
Wednesday, 4 March 2009
EXTRAORDINARY TIMES AHEAD FOR FONTERRA?
Farmers Weekly is carrying a yarn about concern about Fonterra.Its an open letter to board members and suppliers from Kevin and Andrea Marsh of Te Puke.
- Their concerns are the retention of Fonterra of 28c of the $7.90 payout.
- Shifting the balance date so there was a longer wait for final seasonal payment in October of the following season.
- Downsizing the forecast with little notice.
- Altering the announced schedules of payments with no increase till July rather than suppliers receiving boosts in November and February
- All of the above factors in another season of dry January and February - with no payouts till July.
And some governance issues make much more interesting reading here as well.
The upshot is that the Marsh's have said that they want to establish if other shareholders feel the same way they do. If they get support from 10 percent of the shareholders then they want to hold an extraordinary general meeting.
A old Southern Jersey Heifer has told Roarprawn that these issues have struck a chord and the good money is on the Marsh's getting the numbers for a meeting.
Watch this space.
Saturday, 21 February 2009
FONTERRA GIVEN ALL CLEAR BY FOOD SAFETY
Wednesday, 28 January 2009
FONTERRA BOARD NEEDS A ROCKET
If not this will drag on and will continue to damage the milk giant as it plays out.
Monday, 12 January 2009
ARE SHAREHOLDERS GETTING THE TRUE PICTURE OF FONTERRAS POSITION?
We have been watching Fonterra with some interest since the San Lu scandal. Initially we thought they shouldbe given the benefit of the doubt over how they handled the initial crisis. Now we think that the whole issue was handled badly.
Now this appears in the Agridata blog so we are beginning to feel some unease. And we wonder what is happening to shareholder confidence.
Manawatu/Rangitikei Fed Farmers VP Andrew Hoggard says Fonterra’s announcement it is considering raising $300 million won’t affect dairy farmers, but he is worried the co-operative is raising capital to pay the bills. Fonterra said in February it expects to offer senior retail bonds, with the ability to accept oversubscriptions. The co-operative said it intends to use any money raised for general business purposes, including working capital requirements.
Read more here
But it is this speculation in the final paragraph that is perhaps the most worrying.
Mr Hoggard said although concerned about the $300 million, there are other worries for dairy farmer shareholders. “We have heard that all Fonterra’s storage is full, meaning it is stockpiling product. That means it’s not selling.” He said these are worrying times for all farmers. “There will be serious belt tightening in the coming year as dairy farmers cope with the lower payout and have less money to use for any spending.
Wednesday, 7 January 2009
FONTERRA STILL DROWING IN SEA OF CONTAMINATED MILK
We also reckon that Fonterras handling of this issue will be used as a PR example of what not to do by all tutors of the dark arts.
update - this from Macdoctor
Your epidemiologist friends are certainly right. At one point China reported 158 babies were in acute kidney failure. Given that this is a serious condition needing a lot of specialised equipment, it is unlikely all of them survived.
A neonatologist friend reckoned that 20-30% would die within a month or two and about half of the survivors would die within the next 10 years from complications of chronic renal failure.
Yes. You did read that right. 30-40 babies are already dead. Another 50-60 will not see their teens.
Feel free to be sick. I know I will.
Thursday, 2 October 2008
MELAMINE SCANDAL GROWS MORE COMPLEX
This from the Herald
We here at Roarprawn aren't too sure.
Homepaddock has more
VERY DISTURBING REVELATIONS FROM HOMEPADDOCK
Read Here
This is a very big scandal... and if this is true, and we at Roarprawn see no reason to doubt it, it will lessen the impact on Fonterra.
But with the continued censorship by China, will the true facts ever be known?
Tuesday, 30 September 2008
CHINESE COVERUP OF SAN LU DEATHS
MacDoctor says there were 4 reported deaths and 158 with renal failure and it was expected more of those babies would die.
So there should be a lot more deaths and a lot more news ..
SHONKY SURVEY GOOD EXAMPLE OF PR DARK ARTS
This is why PR gets a bad name - this is a classic example of the dark arts, and at a time when New Zealand and Fonterra need informed media coverage we get this pap. Here's what the Herald had this morning.
More than half of Chinese consumers have less trust in New Zealand dairy produce because of the poisonous-milk powder crisis engulfing Fonterra, says a survey by Sinogie Consulting.
This is the worrying bit.
Fonterra's 43 per cent-owned Chinese dairy company San Lu is one of 22 firms caught up in the scandal over the industrial chemical melamine being added to watered-down milk to boost apparent protein levels. The contamination has made tens of thousands of infants ill and killed at least four.
Sinogie, a Hong Kong company, commissioned a survey of 300 shoppers in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou between September 22 and 25 and found 51.2 per cent had less trust in New Zealand dairy produce.
Wow that's a big survey.!
Sinogie chief executive Bruce McLaughlin was surprised the figure was not higher.
"What it suggests to me is that people are still seeing this as a San Lu problem."
Suggests???! A hint perhaps - and a nice time for a another brand to infuse the market.
There was not much damage to Fonterra at present but that could change in the long term.
"I would say that Fonterra has to keep its head very low in China at the moment. I think if they start shouting too loudly about the Chinese authorities being to blame, then the Chinese authorities will react and it won't be pretty."
More than half the respondents (56.2 per cent) said they had been buying more foreign-branded dairy produce since the scandal broke, while 79.8 per cent were worried that all brands of infant formula, domestic and foreign, could be contaminated.
New Zealand came second behind the European Union when people were asked to rank food from markets for trustworthiness.
"I think New Zealand itself enjoys such a strong brand that while Fonterra is obviously probably your biggest food company, I think people will still have a lot of faith in other New Zealand brands."
Mr McLaughlin said he had seen many companies run into difficulty in China.
"I think that people are blinded by this idea of mysterious China still. Because of that they don't think that they should go in with the same level of caution [as if] investing in Australia or America or somewhere like that."
A Fonterra spokesman said the company approached its investment in San Lu very cautiously.
"Fonterra has been doing business in China for over 20 years so the company was well aware of not just the business but also the wider political and cultural complexities of operating as a foreign company in China."
Fonterra undertook very deliberate and careful due diligence before making the decision to invest, he said.
Its strategy was to progressively upgrade operations and it had also begun a plan to introduce better-quality milk to the supply chain by investing in its first farm in China.
"However, in moving to steadily improve San Lu's quality-control systems, it was impractical to be in a position to protect 100 per cent against all risks to San Lu's supply chain such as a deliberate criminal contamination
Monday, 29 September 2008
MELAMINE ISSUE HITS NZ EXPORTER
Sad really because as any toxicologist will tell you its the dose that's important . So traces of Melamine, which wont impact on human health, will undoubtedly be used as trade barriers around the world.
FONTERRAS COMPETITORS NOT WASTING TIME
But this is from the Sinogie website...That lists their client projects
Sinogie Dairy manufacturer
USA
Research into the current and potential market for processed cheese and other dairy products in China: investigation of current and potential size of the consumer and institutional markets; research into national and regional eating habits and taste preferences; information on current and future government dairy industry policies; identification and evaluation of over 30 dairies which could be local manufacturing partners or acquisition targets.
This is a good example of the dark arts of PR. Fonterra can expect more.
Friday, 26 September 2008
Fonterra milk scandal sours
Strange land and all that - but this latest revelation about bacterial contamination is bad and as MACDOCTOR points out - its still seems that the directors dont know or cant find out what is going on ...
Fonterra’s China dream is finished.
Future investors must learn Fonterra’s lesson well. When you are dealing with an authoritarian society where face-saving is the norm, you must expect that mistakes and bad news will always be covered up. This is not to say that the Chinese are dishonest, far from it, they just have away of handling failure that confuses us. The type of transparency that you see in New Zealand, where even the Leader of the Opposition fronts up and apologises, is one that is unique to the West. Trade with China is certainly possible. Participation in joint ventures will require some work on both of our parts.
Homepaddock also has a good take on this issue...
As does Inquiring Mind who says SanLu is going cheap.
And I will now admit their PR sucks.
Thursday, 18 September 2008
Fonterra the heros in growing tainted milk scandal?
this from the Herald
The snowballing crisis was "gut-wrenching", Mr Ferrier said.
Fonterra was not counting the cost of the crisis on its 43 per cent stake in the Chinese company San Lu, which made the contaminated products.
"We're not sitting here counting money, we're sitting here just making sure we do the right thing.
"Fonterra wants to do whatever it can to help the situation in China.
"Right now, we understand the Chinese Government has stepped in and is looking after the health of the children.
"We will see ... if there's something else we can do."